Today, since the November 1st applications are due tomorrow, both of us finished up some Baylor apps and other college apps.

We did a bit of research for our thesis as well, and found this info:
http://www.eurostemcell.org/factsheet/embyronic-stem-cell-research-ethical-dilemma

The ethical dilemma

Embryonic stem cell research poses a moral dilemma. It forces us to choose between two moral principles:

• The duty to prevent or alleviate suffering
• The duty to respect the value of human life

In the case of embryonic stem cell research, it is impossible to respect both moral principles. To obtain embryonic stem cells, the early embryo has to be destroyed. This means destroying a potential human life. But embryonic stem cell research could lead to the discovery of new medical treatments that would alleviate the suffering of many people. So which moral principle should have the upper hand in this situation? The answer hinges on how we view the embryo. Does it have the status of a person?

Further within the article is more info on the ethics and the debate over whether or not this type of research is ethical.